楼主: tswangqiang
1570 2

[财经时事] China's Economy: 60 Years of Progress (part 3) [推广有奖]

  • 0关注
  • 0粉丝

讲师

0%

还不是VIP/贵宾

-

威望
0
论坛币
576 个
通用积分
1.0000
学术水平
1 点
热心指数
3 点
信用等级
6 点
经验
1365 点
帖子
130
精华
0
在线时间
257 小时
注册时间
2009-10-2
最后登录
2021-7-11

+2 论坛币
k人 参与回答

经管之家送您一份

应届毕业生专属福利!

求职就业群
赵安豆老师微信:zhaoandou666

经管之家联合CDA

送您一个全额奖学金名额~ !

感谢您参与论坛问题回答

经管之家送您两个论坛币!

+2 论坛币
Let's consider the ways China's economy changed over the 20 years that began in 1958. Reforms in the areas of public ownership and socialist means of production gave the centrally planned economy a welcome push during this period, and the economy was able to accomplish some notable feats. But the system's inherent problems soon became evident. The entire national economy resembled one, large enterprise, with the central government functioning as head office and local governments the branches. Enterprises that should have been independent entities resembled production workshops operating under a parent company umbrella.Like a big business, the central government issued directives and passed them on to lower level departments, which in turn gave orders to the workshops. This top-down system of order-giving was unusually complicated and oftentimes led to inaccuracies. It combined production with consumption and lacked the flexibility needed to make adjustments. To an outside observer, China's national economy might have appeared orderly. But, in fact, it had already fallen into a state of rigid inefficiency.
As central planning began dragging down the national economy, the central government tried to make some policy adjustments. However, constrained by the ideology of that period and limited knowledge, the adjustments in this early phase were little more than minor patches for the framework of a planned economy. Also, measures often deviated from their original plans – and sometimes moved in the opposite direction -- when put into practice.
Later, it became evident that there was no way to root out all potential problems while reforming a centrally planned economy. On the contrary, whenever a policy adjustment was implemented by central planning's elite few, everyone in China was suddenly forced to participate, jolting the entire society. Moreover, the system lacked any sort of social safety net.
Power Transfer
During this phase, the central government started granting more administrative power to local governments. This policy marked the first major revamping of the planned economy. It was as if leaders of a parent company had granted a certain amount of managerial authority to subsidiaries. The adjustments increased competition among subsidiaries but, in essence, the system did not significantly change.
The central government was still the nation's largest enterprise, relying primarily on administrative decree to operate. It did not depend on market price signals to allocate resources based on scarcity. To a significant degree, it was extremely dependent on accurate and detailed advanced planning. Without price signals to provide objective criteria, it was difficult to assess the pros and cons of subjective planning and make rational decisions. Intrinsic shortcomings of policy, as well as problems with execution and motivational issues, contributed to varying amounts of inefficiency, waste and loss.
In 1957, based on an August 1956 resolution approved at a meeting of the Eighth National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the central government instituted reforms and granted more administrative power to local governments. The transfer of power took effect at the beginning of 1958, creating a kind of decentralized command economy.
At the same time, massive numbers of people were moving into communes. The merging and reorganization of agriculture production cooperatives and the integration of governmental administration and commune management further strengthened the government's control of the rural economy as well as the entire society. This movement became the basis for the Great Leap Forward initiated by Mao Zedong in 1958.
The policy that granted administrative authority to local governments did not match Mao Zedong's line of thinking when he raised the subject in a speech called On 10 Major Relationships. As a result, changes in the structure of domestic politics in 1957 and '58 made the idea of transferring power to local governments and enterprises politically incorrect.
Prior to the Eighth National Congress, many controlling economic bodies and state-owned enterprise (SOE) leaders had already expressed a keen interest in Yugoslavia's experiment with "enterprise autonomy," and hoped China could draw lessons. At the congress, autonomy became a hot discussion topic. But later in 1957, CPC criticism of Yugoslavia's so-called "self-governing socialism" began to grow, and the idea of granting more power to enterprises was subsequently left off the reform plan agenda for China.
Mao Zedong's On 10 Major Relationships touched on how best to grant more power to enterprises, workers and individuals in order to "muster up enthusiasm." At the time, his ideas were very similar to those found in policies in other socialist countries, which were increasing material incentives for SOE workers through a process of "de-Stalinization." By 1957, a divergence in views between CCP and the Soviet Union regarding Stalinism was becoming apparent. The Anti-Rightist Movement was well under way, and "individualism" had been deemed as harmful as opposing the CCP and socialism. The movement demanded that people "cut the fetters and fame of wealth." That put the idea of using material incentives to muster enthusiasm among individual workers in direct conflict with dominant ideology.
In this political climate, policies granting additional power and profit rights could only be implemented for the sake of local governments. So a transfer of power to local governments became the basis for reform in 1958. "Institutional reform" was defined as "transferring administrative power to lower levels." And this kind of reformist thinking had a profound influence on China's future economic development.
The Eighth Plenary Session of the CPC, which convened in September 1957, was the meeting where the Great Leap Forward was launched. At the same time, it established an "economic administrative management system" to "make rapid progress in building a solid economic foundation." A five-member working group headed by committee member Chen Yun drafted three key regulations, including directives for improving industrial and commercial administrative management systems, and for dividing the financial and administration powers of the central and local governments.
二维码

扫码加我 拉你入群

请注明:姓名-公司-职位

以便审核进群资格,未注明则拒绝

关键词:Progress Economy econom years China Economy China PART years Progress

沙发
金戈一杰 发表于 2009-10-8 10:23:23 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
让我们考虑一下中国的经济在20年开始,在1958年发生的变化。在公有制和社会主义生产方式领域的改革使中央计划经济在此期间一个值得欢迎的推动,经济能够完成一些显着的功勋。但该系统的固有问题很快发现。整个国民经济的相似与中央政府之一,大型企业作为总行和分行地方政府的运作。企业应该有独立的实体,类似于生产车间根据母公司伞经营。就像一个大企业,中央发出指示,并通过他们到下级部门,而这又下令工作坊。这种自上而下的命令系统,提供了异常复杂,还经常导致不准确。它结合生产和消费缺乏必要作出调整的灵活性。对于一个旁观者,中国国民经济可能出现有序。但事实上,它已经陷入了低效率的僵化状态。
由于中央计划开始拖累国家经济,中央政府试图作出一些政策调整。然而,在这一时期的思想和知识有限的限制,在这个早期阶段的调整,只不过是为计划经济的框架更小补丁。此外,措施往往偏离最初的计划-有时是相反的方向移动-当付诸实施。
后来,很明显,有没有办法从根本上改革所有在中央计划经济的隐忧。相反,每当一项政策调整实施的中央计划的少数精英,在中国人突然被迫参与,全社会的颠簸。此外,该系统缺乏任何社会安全网络。
电力传输
在这个阶段,中央政府开始批出更多的管理权给地方政府。这一政策标志着计划经济的第一次重大改组。这就像一个母公司领导人授予的管理权一定量的子公司。调整增加的子公司之间的竞争,但本质上,该系统并没有明显变化。
中央政府仍然是全国最大的企业,依靠行政命令,主要经营。它不依赖于市场价格信号的基础上分配稀缺资源。在很大程度上,这是非常依赖于先进的准确和详细规划。没有价格信号,以提供客观的标准,因此很难评估的优点和缺点和主观规划作出理性的决定。先天不足的政策,以及执行和激励性的问题,促进了不同程度的效率低下,浪费和损失数额。
1957年,根据对1956年8月在第八次全国代表大会的中国共产党(中共),中央实行的改革会议通过决议,授予更多行政权力给地方政府。移交权力发生在1958年开始实施,创造了分散指挥经济。
同时,大量人口人数搬进公社。合并和农业生产合作社的重组和政府管理和社区管理相结合,进一步加强政府对农村经济的控制以及整个社会。这一运动成为了大跃进的基础上,毛泽东在1958年发起的。
的政策,给予行政权力给地方政府并不符合毛泽东的思想路线时,他提出了一个名为演讲题目十大关系。因此,在国内政治结构的变化在1957年和'58使得权力移交的想法地方政府和企业在政治上不正确的。
在此之前的第八次全国代表大会,许多经济机构和控制国有企业(国有企业)的领导人已经表示了与“企业自主权”,在南斯拉夫的实验浓厚的兴趣,并希望中国能借鉴。在这次代表大会,自治成为热门话题。但后来在1957年,批评南斯拉夫共产党的所谓“自治社会主义”开始增长,并给予企业更多权力的想法,后来的缺席为中国改革计划的议程。
毛泽东论十大关系谈及如何以最佳方式给予更多的权力,企业,工人和为了个人的“召集了热情。”当时,他的想法很相似,在其他社会主义国家的政策中发现的,它们通过增加对“去进程斯大林对国有企业职工的物质奖励。”到1957年,在与共产党和苏联对斯大林的看法分歧越来越明显。在反右运动正在顺利进行,和“个人主义”已被视为有害的反对共产党和社会主义。该运动要求人们“减少束缚和财富的名气。”这把用物质刺激鼓起与优势之间的直接冲突的意识形态个体劳动者积极性的想法。
在这种政治环境,政策给予更多的权力和利润的权利,只能用于地方政府为了实施。因此,一个权力移交给地方政府,成为1958年改革的基础。 “机构改革”的定义是“行政权力转移到较低的水平。”而这种思维方式的改革了对中国未来的经济发展产生深远的影响。
第八次全会的中共而言,则1957年9月召开的会议,是在大跃进发起了会议。同时,它建立了一个“经济的行政管理体制”,要“建立一个坚实的经济基础方面取得迅速进展。”一个五人工作小组委员会委员陈於嗯为首的起草三个关键包括提高工商行政管理系统的指令规定,并划分中央和地方政府的财政和行政权力。

GOOGLE自动翻译的啊........有错不要找我
最新的财经新闻!
最棒的财经评论!!
最深入的思想碰撞!!!
好的话题和评论可能加精哦
http://www.pinggu.org/bbs/b26.html

使用道具

藤椅
金戈一杰 发表于 2009-10-8 10:24:13 |只看作者 |坛友微信交流群
让我们考虑一下中国的经济在20年开始,在1958年发生的变化。在公有制和社会主义生产方式领域的改革使中央计划经济在此期间一个值得欢迎的推动,经济能够完成一些显着的功勋。但该系统的固有问题很快发现。整个国民经济的相似与中央政府之一,大型企业作为总行和分行地方政府的运作。企业应该有独立的实体,类似于生产车间根据母公司伞经营。就像一个大企业,中央发出指示,并通过他们到下级部门,而这又下令工作坊。这种自上而下的命令系统,提供了异常复杂,还经常导致不准确。它结合生产和消费缺乏必要作出调整的灵活性。对于一个旁观者,中国国民经济可能出现有序。但事实上,它已经陷入了低效率的僵化状态。
由于中央计划开始拖累国家经济,中央政府试图作出一些政策调整。然而,在这一时期的思想和知识有限的限制,在这个早期阶段的调整,只不过是为计划经济的框架更小补丁。此外,措施往往偏离最初的计划-有时是相反的方向移动-当付诸实施。
后来,很明显,有没有办法从根本上改革所有在中央计划经济的隐忧。相反,每当一项政策调整实施的中央计划的少数精英,在中国人突然被迫参与,全社会的颠簸。此外,该系统缺乏任何社会安全网络。
电力传输
在这个阶段,中央政府开始批出更多的管理权给地方政府。这一政策标志着计划经济的第一次重大改组。这就像一个母公司领导人授予的管理权一定量的子公司。调整增加的子公司之间的竞争,但本质上,该系统并没有明显变化。
中央政府仍然是全国最大的企业,依靠行政命令,主要经营。它不依赖于市场价格信号的基础上分配稀缺资源。在很大程度上,这是非常依赖于先进的准确和详细规划。没有价格信号,以提供客观的标准,因此很难评估的优点和缺点和主观规划作出理性的决定。先天不足的政策,以及执行和激励性的问题,促进了不同程度的效率低下,浪费和损失数额。
1957年,根据对1956年8月在第八次全国代表大会的中国共产党(中共),中央实行的改革会议通过决议,授予更多行政权力给地方政府。移交权力发生在1958年开始实施,创造了分散指挥经济。
同时,大量人口人数搬进公社。合并和农业生产合作社的重组和政府管理和社区管理相结合,进一步加强政府对农村经济的控制以及整个社会。这一运动成为了大跃进的基础上,毛泽东在1958年发起的。
的政策,给予行政权力给地方政府并不符合毛泽东的思想路线时,他提出了一个名为演讲题目十大关系。因此,在国内政治结构的变化在1957年和'58使得权力移交的想法地方政府和企业在政治上不正确的。
在此之前的第八次全国代表大会,许多经济机构和控制国有企业(国有企业)的领导人已经表示了与“企业自主权”,在南斯拉夫的实验浓厚的兴趣,并希望中国能借鉴。在这次代表大会,自治成为热门话题。但后来在1957年,批评南斯拉夫共产党的所谓“自治社会主义”开始增长,并给予企业更多权力的想法,后来的缺席为中国改革计划的议程。
毛泽东论十大关系谈及如何以最佳方式给予更多的权力,企业,工人和为了个人的“召集了热情。”当时,他的想法很相似,在其他社会主义国家的政策中发现的,它们通过增加对“去进程斯大林对国有企业职工的物质奖励。”到1957年,在与共产党和苏联对斯大林的看法分歧越来越明显。在反右运动正在顺利进行,和“个人主义”已被视为有害的反对共产党和社会主义。该运动要求人们“减少束缚和财富的名气。”这把用物质刺激鼓起与优势之间的直接冲突的意识形态个体劳动者积极性的想法。
在这种政治环境,政策给予更多的权力和利润的权利,只能用于地方政府为了实施。因此,一个权力移交给地方政府,成为1958年改革的基础。“机构改革”的定义是“行政权力转移到较低的水平。“而这种思维方式的改革了对中国未来的经济发展产生深远的影响。
第八次全会的中共而言,则1957年9月召开的会议,是在大跃进发起了会议。同时,它建立了一个“经济的行政管理体制”,要“建立一个坚实的经济基础方面取得迅速进展。“一个五人工作小组委员会委员陈于嗯为首的起草三个关键包括提高工商行政管理系统的指令规定,并划分中央和地方政府的财政和行政权力。

 谷歌自动翻译的啊........有错不要找我
最新的财经新闻!
最棒的财经评论!!
最深入的思想碰撞!!!
好的话题和评论可能加精哦
http://www.pinggu.org/bbs/b26.html

使用道具

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 我要注册

本版微信群
加JingGuanBbs
拉您进交流群

京ICP备16021002-2号 京B2-20170662号 京公网安备 11010802022788号 论坛法律顾问:王进律师 知识产权保护声明   免责及隐私声明

GMT+8, 2024-4-20 10:27